Skip to content

dd: point the caret at the failing part of an operand - #14014

Open
sylvestre wants to merge 1 commit into
caret-seqfrom
caret-dd
Open

dd: point the caret at the failing part of an operand#14014
sylvestre wants to merge 1 commit into
caret-seqfrom
caret-dd

Conversation

@sylvestre

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stack created with GitHub Stacks CLIGive Feedback 💬

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 18, 2026 20:59

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 2.97%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 353 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 50 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation numfmt_stream_to_si_precision 346.4 ms 400.1 ms -13.42%
Simulation numfmt_to_si_precision[10000] 92 ms 97.7 ms -5.84%
Simulation ls_recursive_deep_tree[(200, 2)] 3.7 ms 3.6 ms +4.64%
Simulation cksum_crc32b 42.4 ms 40.8 ms +3.92%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing caret-dd (fe7e4e1) with main (1a36740)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 50 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on caret-seq (4af497c) during the generation of this report, so main (1a36740) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants