Skip to content

CLDSRV-976: bump arsenal to 8.4.24 - #6256

Merged
bert-e merged 1 commit into
development/9.3from
bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

CLDSRV-976: bump arsenal to 8.4.24#6256
bert-e merged 1 commit into
development/9.3from
bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal

Conversation

@tcarmet

@tcarmet tcarmet commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sproxyd now answers DELETE and batch-delete requests with 204 No Content, and the sproxyd client carried by the previous Arsenal only accepted 200 and 206 as success. Deletes were therefore retried and eventually surfaced to S3 clients as internal errors. This picks up the Arsenal version carrying the fixed client so deletes succeed again.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello tcarmet,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request.
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-976 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.3.17

  • 9.4.2

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-976, or the target
branch of this pull request.

Comment thread package.json Outdated
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.20%. Comparing base (4aaa615) to head (ed1cce7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on development/9.3.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph
see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.3    #6256      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            85.18%   85.20%   +0.02%     
===================================================
  Files                  206      206              
  Lines                13434    13434              
===================================================
+ Hits                 11444    11447       +3     
+ Misses                1990     1987       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 68.38% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
file-ft-tests-null-compat 68.89% <ø> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests 28.36% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 69.55% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v1-ft-tests 69.53% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 36.82% <ø> (ø)
s3c-ft-tests-v0 64.02% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
s3c-ft-tests-v0-null-compat 64.06% <ø> (ø)
s3c-ft-tests-v1 63.97% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests 36.78% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests-inflights 37.82% <ø> (ø)
unit 71.18% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 34.61% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@tcarmet
tcarmet force-pushed the bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal branch 2 times, most recently from 5bb2dd3 to eb1397a Compare August 19, 2026 16:22
@tcarmet
tcarmet marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2026 16:32
@tcarmet
tcarmet requested a review from a team August 19, 2026 16:32
@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-976 contains:

  • 9.3.17

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.3.17

  • 9.4.2

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-976, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@tcarmet

tcarmet commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Conflict

A conflict has been raised during the creation of
integration branch w/9.4/bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal with contents from bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal
and development/9.4.

I have not created the integration branch.

Here are the steps to resolve this conflict:

 git fetch
 git checkout -B w/9.4/bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal origin/development/9.4
 git merge origin/bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal
 # <intense conflict resolution>
 git commit
 git push -u origin w/9.4/bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@tcarmet

tcarmet commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/status

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Status

check status
➡️ Approvals ❗ author approval required — 2 peer approval(s) missing
➡️ Integration builds ❗ w/9.4/bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal: INPROGRESS
➡️ Fix versions ☀️
➡️ History ☀️

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@tcarmet
tcarmet requested a review from a team August 19, 2026 18:43
@tcarmet

tcarmet commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Conflict with a changeset in the queue

The changeset in this pull request conflicts with another changeset
already in the queue. Please wait for the current queue to merge into
the development branch. The conflict will then appear in this pull
request and can be sorted on the feature branch directly.

This changeset has not been added to the queue.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

Arsenal 8.4.24 pulls in sproxydclient 8.2.2, which treats any 2xx
response from sproxyd as a success instead of whitelisting 200 and
206. sproxyd answers DELETE and POST .batch_delete with 204 (no
content), which the previous whitelist turned into an error, and
DataWrapper then retried three times before surfacing an
InternalError that reached the S3 client as a 500.

Also bumps the project version to 9.3.18.

Issue: CLDSRV-976
@tcarmet
tcarmet force-pushed the bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal branch from eb1397a to ed1cce7 Compare August 20, 2026 18:47
@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

History mismatch

Merge commit #eb1397ab3fa8f22cdaab5e432d01f2938de25e01 on the integration branch
w/9.4/bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal is merging a branch which is neither the current
branch bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal nor the development branch
development/9.4.

It is likely due to a rebase of the branch bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal and the
merge is not possible until all related w/* branches are deleted or updated.

Please use the reset command to have me reinitialize these branches.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.3

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

This pull request did not target the following hotfix branch(es) so they
were left untouched:

  • hotfix/7.10.28
  • hotfix/7.4.2
  • hotfix/8.8.45
  • hotfix/7.10.15
  • hotfix/7.4.3
  • hotfix/7.70.11
  • hotfix/7.10.30
  • hotfix/6.4.7
  • hotfix/9.0.32
  • hotfix/7.10.0
  • hotfix/7.10.2
  • hotfix/7.10.1
  • hotfix/7.70.51
  • hotfix/7.7.0
  • hotfix/7.9.0
  • hotfix/7.2.0
  • hotfix/7.6.0
  • hotfix/7.10.4
  • hotfix/7.4.6
  • hotfix/7.4.5
  • hotfix/7.70.21
  • hotfix/7.4.10
  • hotfix/7.4.0
  • hotfix/7.10.49
  • hotfix/7.4.4
  • hotfix/7.4.8
  • hotfix/7.10.27
  • hotfix/7.70.45
  • hotfix/9.2.36
  • hotfix/7.4.1
  • hotfix/7.10.3
  • hotfix/7.10.8
  • hotfix/9.0.7
  • hotfix/7.8.0
  • hotfix/7.70.73
  • hotfix/7.4.9
  • hotfix/9.2.24
  • hotfix/7.4.7

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-976.

Goodbye tcarmet.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e
bert-e merged commit ed1cce7 into development/9.3 Aug 20, 2026
37 checks passed
@bert-e
bert-e deleted the bugfix/CLDSRV-976-bump-arsenal branch August 20, 2026 19:21
@tcarmet

tcarmet commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/status

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants