Fix AIO webhook worker command

[lntutor]

☑️ Resolves

• Fix Small typo for AIO webhook polling script #15399

🖼️ Screenshots

Not applicable; this corrects a command example without changing visual documentation.

✅ Checklist

• I have built the documentation locally and reviewed the output
• Screenshots are included for visual changes (not applicable)
• I have not moved or renamed pages
• I have run codespell and addressed any spelling issues

Validation: sphinx-lint, codespell, and the warning-as-error Administration Manual HTML build all pass.

[lntutor]

Current head 1c27933602c85caff944745934355662143a0719 is mergeable, DCO is green on this head, and there are no unresolved review threads on the current PR state. This looks ready for maintainer review when convenient.

[github-actions]

Hello there,
Thank you so much for taking the time and effort to create a pull request to our Nextcloud project.

We hope that the review process is going smooth and is helpful for you. We want to ensure your pull request is reviewed to your satisfaction. If you have a moment, our community management team would very much appreciate your feedback on your experience with this PR review process.

Your feedback is valuable to us as we continuously strive to improve our community developer experience. Please take a moment to complete our short survey by clicking on the following link: https://cloud.nextcloud.com/apps/forms/s/i9Ago4EQRZ7TWxjfmeEpPkf6

Thank you for contributing to Nextcloud and we hope to hear from you soon!

(If you believe you should not receive this message, you can add yourself to the blocklist.)

[szaimen]

Suggested change

	set -e; while true; do sudo docker exec -it nextcloud-aio-mastercontainer docker exec -it nextcloud-aio-nextcloud sudo -E -u www-data php occ background-job:worker -v -t 60 "OCA\WebhookListeners\BackgroundJobs\WebhookCall"; done
	set -e; while true; do sudo docker exec --user www-data nextcloud-aio-nextcloud php occ background-job:worker -v -t 60 "OCA\WebhookListeners\BackgroundJobs\WebhookCall"; done

[pabzm]

I don't know why you suggest this but I think the change would be worthwhile to merge without your suggestion, too, correct?

I'm wondering why to call docker inside the mastercontainer in the first place. It's controlling the same docker daemon as from the host system, isn't it?

[szaimen]

Yeah it doesnt make sense. That why I added this suggestion

[pabzm]

Alright, thank you for the confirmation!

[pabzm]

@lntutor Thank you for your contribution, and sorry that it took so long to review it!

Your change fixes the actual execution, but @szaimen's requested change remove a useless indirection, and even improves the change in our eyes. Could you apply the suggestion? Then we'd happily merge this! Thanks!