Skip to content

Add repo-standardizer skill: polish any GitHub repo surface - #2715

Open
programmingWTF wants to merge 4 commits into
github:mainfrom
programmingWTF:add-repo-standardizer
Open

Add repo-standardizer skill: polish any GitHub repo surface#2715
programmingWTF wants to merge 4 commits into
github:mainfrom
programmingWTF:add-repo-standardizer

Conversation

@programmingWTF

@programmingWTF programmingWTF commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Adds repo-standardizer — a skill that polishes any GitHub repository's surface: label taxonomy (emoji rating tiers, P0–P3 priority, impact severity), issue forms, PR template, CI workflows (Node/Python/Go/Rust), CODEOWNERS, rulesets, and docs. Repo metadata & config only — never touches code logic.

Why it fits

  • Complements the existing ai-ready skill (which generates AI config files): repo-standardizer handles the repo surface — labels, issue forms, PR template, CI config, branch rulesets, docs
  • Agent-agnostic and idempotent: safe to re-run, never clobbers user content, auth-first dry-run
  • Published on ClawHub (@programmingwtf/repo-standardizer, v1.0.0, clean security scan) with a v1.0.0 release

Details

  • — SKILL.md + 22 templates (labels.json, issue forms, CI workflows, CODEOWNERS, docs)
  • — regenerated via npm run build
  • npm run skill:validate passes (411/411 skills valid)

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 19, 2026 11:33
Copilot AI reviewed Aug 19, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added new-submission PR adds at least one new contribution skills PR touches skills labels Aug 19, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 PR Risk Scan Results

Scanned 22 changed file(s).

Severity Count
🔴 High 0
🟠 Medium 0
ℹ️ Info 0

✅ No matching risk patterns were detected in changed files.

This is an automated soft-gate report. Findings indicate review targets and do not block merge by themselves.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the skill-check-error Skill validator reported errors label Aug 19, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 19, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Vally Lint Results

✅ All checks passed

Scope Checked
Skills 1
Agents 0
Total 1
Severity Count
❌ Errors 0
⚠️ Warnings 0
ℹ️ Advisories 0

Summary

Level Finding
ℹ️ ✅ repo-standardizer (2/2 checks passed)
ℹ️ ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
ℹ️ ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
ℹ️ ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
ℹ️ ✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.
ℹ️ 1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed
Full linter output 
### Linting skills/repo-standardizer
✅ repo-standardizer (2/2 checks passed)
    ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
        ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
    ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
        ✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.

1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 19, 2026 12:18
Copilot AI reviewed Aug 19, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@programmingWTF
docs(skill): drop markdown relative links from README language-switch…
4dbff4d 
…er example

Vally valid-refs flagged ./README.md and ./README.zh.md as missing file
references; they are generated artifacts, not skill files. Keep the
example as plain text to satisfy the linter.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 20, 2026 08:46
Copilot AI reviewed Aug 20, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the skill-check-error Skill validator reported errors label Aug 20, 2026
@programmingWTF
fix(template): add missing language switcher to English README template
6c883ad 
Align with README.zh.md template and SKILL.md switcher convention:
current language as plain text, other languages as relative links.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 20, 2026 08:56
Copilot AI reviewed Aug 20, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@aaronpowell aaronpowell Awaiting requested review from aaronpowell aaronpowell is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

new-submission PR adds at least one new contribution skills PR touches skills

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@programmingWTF