Replace internal use of deprecated function - #201
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Håkon Wiik Ånes <hwaanes@gmail.com>
|
Warning! No news item is found for this PR. If this is a user-facing |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #201 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.21% 99.21%
=======================================
Files 15 15
Lines 2554 2554
=======================================
Hits 2534 2534
Misses 20 20 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Thanks for catching that. Are there tests for that function that need to be updated? |
|
I noticed the use of the deprecated function in a couple of tests. I assumed those were still there to test that the deprecation warning was properly emitted. If you want I can update the tests. |
|
Ok. Got it. I can merge this but we have to merge another OR that fixes the pre commit. Thanks for the PR! This PR doesn't require a news but please read about how we use that to maintain the changelog. Search for news on the scikit-package documentation if you are interested |
|
Sounds good, thanks! |
|
Thanks so much. We really appreciate contributions from the community! |
|
Hi @sbillinge, any chance of making a release with this fix in? |
|
yes, sure. We are waiting for it to pass CI so we can merge it. I think you need to merge main to get the pre-commit to pass. |
|
@hakonanes are you able to merge main into your branch so we can pick up the pre-commit update and get CI passing? |
|
Thanks @hakonanes. It looks as if this fix was part of the other cleaning that we did on the main branch so this PR is not showing any changes in the diff. We really appreciate your PR though and we hope you are able to contribute again in the future. It means a lot to us. when we get PRs from the community. We pushed out some new releases in preparation for our presentation at the software fayre at IUCr so it is possible that if you simply Thanks again! |
Solves #200.