Skip to content

no quiescense when doing vm snapshot on individual disks - #13941

Draft
DaanHoogland wants to merge 1 commit into
4.20from
ghi12871-noQuiesceOnVmSnapshot
Draft

no quiescense when doing vm snapshot on individual disks#13941
DaanHoogland wants to merge 1 commit into
4.20from
ghi12871-noQuiesceOnVmSnapshot

Conversation

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR...

Fixes: #12871

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@EduFrazao @davift @andrea-janna , could you have a look at this?

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland added this to the 4.20.4 milestone Aug 21, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 16.33%. Comparing base (6136ac9) to head (1acd38a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.20   #13941   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     16.32%   16.33%           
- Complexity    13556    13561    +5     
=========================================
  Files          5669     5669           
  Lines        501399   501395    -4     
  Branches      60902    60901    -1     
=========================================
+ Hits          81847    81881   +34     
+ Misses       410390   410347   -43     
- Partials       9162     9167    +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.14% <ø> (ø)
unittests 17.18% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 18943

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

VM instance snapshot fails if "Quiesce Instance" snapshot parameter is true

2 participants